RFID tags better but cost more.
The article discussed the application of RFID in hospital. Some of the facts discussed:
- RFID tag stores information
- Doctors and nurses carrying RFID tag readers, perhaps attached to laptop PCs or personal digital assistants (PDAs), could retrieve up-to-date information from the patient’s wristband if the hospital information system is down.
- Convenient for doctors who could refer to or update patient records from the bedside, as they make clinical observations, prescribe medication or order medical procedures.
- Implementing RFID in a hospital information system could help cut down on errors as well as reduce the clerical workload for nurses, freeing them to get on with actual nursing.
- RFID tags are more physically robust than barcode tags, are reusable.
- No Malaysian private hospital has converted from its barcode-based information system to an RFID-based one.
- Cost could be an issue, with RFID tagging systems costing about twice as much as barcode-based ones.
- RFID tags cost from 15 cents (54sen) to US$10 (RM38) each – depending on data capacity and whether the tag is “active” (carries a radio transmitter), among other things – a barcode tag only costs as much as the paper it is printed on.
- Issuing doctors and nurses with additional IT equipment ranging from Tablet PCs to PDAs and laptop PCs.
- This would add to the implementation costs to the hospital,
- Raise potential security and privacy risks for confidential patient data if the devices are lost or stolen.
Sooner or later, RFID will be a common application in hospitals, and may be in schools to.
1 comment:
Wow,I never even think that the RFID tags can be so useful and convenient for dortors and nurses to track on patients. If one day really can have it in school, then teachers can always find out those black-listed students and retrieve students' information every so often. Isn't it scary? well, it's still good to have it in future.
Post a Comment